|
What are Social Inclusion Partnerships?
There
are currently 48 Social Inclusion Partnerships (SIPs) operating around
Scotland with different origins and focus. However
a number of common factors inform their work. Broadly speaking SIPs are multi-agency partnership bodies
which include local authorities, health boards, further education
providers, the private sector and, crucially, the local community and
voluntary sector. The
Scottish Executive and Communities Scotland have indicated on numerous
occasions that they expect local communities and the voluntary to be
at the heart of SIP decision making processes.
SIPs
are tasked with the coordination of activities to promote social
inclusion, prevent social exclusion and develop innovative models of
working and are funded from the Social Inclusion Partnership Fund
which replaced the Urban Programme in April 1999. The relatively
modest amounts allocated to each SIP by the Scottish Executive are
viewed as a lever to pull down resources from public bodies - the
‘bending’ of mainstream budgets towards local SIP priorities.
The
Scottish Executive’s social justice agenda outlined in the report - Social Justice…A Scotland Where Everyone Matters and the
subsequent annual reports- also
emphasise the key role of SIPs in delivering a range of targets.
SIP Transition Arrangements
The Regeneration arm of Communities Scotland currently has responsibility
for the SIP programme www.communitiesscotland.gov.uk However it is envisaged that
over the next few years Social Inclusion Partnerships will be
‘mainstreamed’ into evolving local Community Planning structures.
The Scottish Executive’s Community Regeneration Statement,
‘Better Communities in Scotland Closing the Gap’, published in
June 2002 provides more detail of the rationale behind this.
www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/social/emsjm-00.asp
www.scotland.gov.uk/library5/social/bcis-00.asp
The framework guiding these transition arrangements was published in
August 2003
www.communitiesscotland.gov.uk/communities/upload/SIPsCPPs.pdf
Under
this framework, control of Social Inclusion Partnerships will be
devolved from Communities Scotland to local Community Planning
structures. Communities Scotland has indicated that the earliest it
expects these transfers to happen is 2004. At present SIPs have
confirmed funding at current levels until March 2005 and it allow it
is difficult to predict it seems likely that many SIPs will opt not to
transfer straight away because of the complexity of managing this
process of change.
As
part of the process of integration Community Planning Partnerships
must submit a self-assessed Statement of Readiness to Communities
Scotland. This should involve all partners, and draw on the experience
of SIP boards and communities. The Statement must satisfy Ministers
that the Community Planning Partnership meets, or is making real and
tangible progress towards, readiness criteria which includes evidence
of partnership working, ‘effective and genuine’ community
engagement, a focus on the most disadvantaged areas and financial
performance and outcome monitoring.
The
third element of the integration process is the production of a
Regeneration Outcome Agreement (ROA) by the CPP for approval by
Ministers. The ROA is designed
to provide a strategic framework which links national and local
priorities for tackling disadvantage with spend and activities,
through SIP and partners’
mainstream resources. This is aimed at improving outcomes for
disadvantaged areas and groups. From
2005/06, the Agreement will provide the basis for each three-year
funding period.
What is Community Planning?
Community Planning is not a new idea. In many ways it can be seen
as logical extension of the some of the thinking behind Social
Inclusion Partnerships. It is designed to provide an overarching
framework to ensure local agencies coordinate and integrate their
activities with the ultimate aim of improving public services.
It is also seen as a mechanism for linking national social
justice policy to local and neighbourhood priorities. Crucially
Community Planning is envisaged as a means of ensuring that people and
communities are genuinely involved in decisions about the planning and
delivery of public services.
However Community Planning Partnerships differ from SIPs in a number
of important respects. Community Planning has a statutory basis. Local
authorities have a legal obligation, as outlined in the Local
Government in Scotland Act 2003, to ensure that they have a Community
Plan in place covering their entire area.
Local authorities are the lead agency in this process and must involve
other public bodies such as Health Boards, Enterprise Companies,
Police, Fire and Transport agencies. These agencies are expected to
participate fully.
The Local Government in Scotland Act 2003, which came into force on 1
April 2003 defines Community Planning as:
“a
process by which the public services provided in the area of the local
authority are planned and provided after consultation and (ongoing)
cooperation …with community bodies and other public bodies.”
The Act also binds all Scottish Executive ministers to a commitment to
promote and encourage Community Planning across Government.
Legislative backing and guidance on process underpin Community Planning
but the Scottish Executive and Communities Scotland see local people
and communities and a shift in ‘culture’ of agencies as the key
drivers for achieving improvements in public services.
Community Planning structures, in common with Social Inclusion
Partnerships, are clearly going to develop in different ways across
Scotland to meet distinct and diverse community needs.
Further information about Community Planning can be located at the
Community Planning Task Force’s website
www.communityplanning.org.uk
Links to detailed information about Social Inclusion Partnerships and
Community Planning are included in the links section of this site.
Revising
the Scottish Deprivation Index
From 2005/06 onwards, the 2004 Index of Deprivation will be
the principal means of deciding the distribution of SIP Funds across
Scotland. This is part the development of a long term strategy for
measuring deprivation, and publication is scheduled for the spring of
2004. These new measurements will have major implications for the
allocation of resources and the evolution of policy priorities. For
example shifts in the spatial concentration of deprivation will see a
revision of the areas which receive additional regeneration resources.
In such cases funding is likely to be phased.
The Scottish Centre for Research on Social Justice
(SCRSJ) has been
commissioned by the Scottish Executive to produce recommendations for a
long-term strategy for measuring deprivation in Scotland. The
recommended measure (or measures) will be used to identify deprived
areas (rural and urban) and deprived
groups of individuals
Further
information is available at-
www.scrsj.ac.uk/deprivation/
Scottish
Centre for Regeneration
The Scottish Centre for Regeneration is part of Communities
Scotland and is “responsible for developing new and practical
approaches to regeneration, and promoting best practice.”
The Centre is based in Govan in Glasgow and has a remit to assist
regeneration practitioners and communities to be:
- better
informed about regeneration and how it works
- more
aware of the roles and perspectives of other practitioners and
representatives from the community and the voluntary sector
- more
knowledgeable about approaches to regeneration practice and their
implementation
- adequately
skilled to work effectively in regeneration
- able
to examine, introduce and learn from innovative approaches to
regeneration.
Further information is available at-
ww.communitiesscotland.gov.uk/
communities36/Web/Site/SCR/about_the_scr.asp
Other Related
Initiatives
A number of other initiatives are also being implemented including the
development of Standards of Community Engagement which will offer
guidance to statutory organisations on how to involve communities, and
various demonstration projects looking at how local communities engage
with CPPs, and resources for national voluntary sector intermediary
bodies to support them to involve communities of interest in Community
Planning.
|